Legal Opinion
Abraham v. Gelwick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 21, 1926No. 16835PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion ' by
RUTH, C.
B. D. Gelwick and Nora V. Gelwick, as plaintiffs, brought their action against Joe Abraham and Louis Abralmm. as defendants, and the parties hereto will be designated as they ap-pA'ced in (he trial court. The cause was tr'eA n”on the plaintiffs’ amended petition, which contained three causes of action as follows, to wit:
“1. Plaintiffs claim to be the owner of certain lots in block 1, Gelwiek addition to the city of Bristow in Creek county, Okla., and allege the defendants claim some right, title or interest therein, and pray defendants be required to set up their pretended…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Local Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hudson-Houston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Marland Refining Co. v. HarrelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Watson v. DossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Holmes v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Stanfield v. LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.