Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Plummer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1923No. 14432PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

Y. H. Plummer commenced this actiom in the county court of Carter county against R E. Simpson andl Mrs. R. B. Simpson to recover damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff alleges he entered into an oral contract with the defendants to farm certain lands in the year 1921, and the defendants breached said contract and plaintiff was damaged in the sum of $500. The defendants filed an answer by way of general denial and pleaded affirmative defenses.

Upon trial of' the case the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $162.50. From said judgment the defendants have appealed. The brief…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katterhenry v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Seamans Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. MueggeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Cook v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Harris v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Davis v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Carter v. Bond & BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API