Seamans Oil Co. v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washington County; Preston A. Shinn, Judge. Action by W. E. Mitchell against the Sea-mans Oil Company to foreclose mechanic’s lien, etc. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.
The defendant in error commenced this action in the district court of Washington county against the plaintiff .in error to recover $1,088 for work performed in cleaning out a well and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon the oil and gas leasehold interest of plaintiff in error. At the time of commencing the action, the defendant in error filed an affidavit for attachment and secured an order of attachment and levied upon property not covered by the mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff in error filed an answer and a motion to discharge the attachment. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- West v. FlemmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Crismon v. Barse Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Blue v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Brennan v. SwaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seamans Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Edwards v. Negim & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924