Legal Opinion

Thurman v. Signal Insurance Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1971PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an appeal by defendant insurance company from a declaratory judgment proceeding in which plaintiff was declared to be entitled to recover under the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile insurance policy issued to her husband by defendant.

The policy sold by defendant to plaintiff’s husband provided uninsured motorist coverage in the *526amount of $10,000 for each person. As the wife of the named insured, plaintiff also was an insured under the terms of the policy.

Plaintiff was involved in an accident while a passenger in an automobile which was driven by her husband and owned by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Traders & General Insurance v. Hicks Rubber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Smith v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Sparling v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Parkway, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cascade Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Werner v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Guthrie v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Byrns v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API