Smith v. Pacific Automobile Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This is a proceeding for a declaratory judgment concerning the rights of the parties under an automobile liability insurance policy. Smith, the insured, seeks $5,000. The defendant-insurer contends that it owes Smith nothing. Prom a judgment awarding Smith $2,500 and attorney’s fees, both parties appeal.
The facts are not in dispute. Smith was injured while riding in an automobile owned by Donald Dame-wood. The injuries were the result of a collision between Damewood’s automobile and a vehicle driven by an uninsured motorist. Damewood was killed in the collision. Smith’s damages are conceded…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Gen. Ins. Co. v. Sask. Gov. Ins. OfficeOregon Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by50 opinions
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.