Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2001No. CC 97C-12315; CA A103338; SC S47182PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle owned and driven by her ex-husband. That vehicle was involved in a collision with a vehicle operated by Mixon. Plaintiff was injured and was awarded damages of $150,028.23 in an arbitration proceeding. Mixon had no automobile liability insurance. Plaintiff and her ex-husband each had uninsured motorist (UM) coverage in the amount of $100,000 under separate but identical policies issued by defendant. Plaintiff made a claim for UM coverage under both policies. Without specifying under which policy it was paying benefits, defendant paid $100,000 in UM…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Thurman v. Signal Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Batten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Kline v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. PannellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. De Zafra v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Sheppard v. Progressive Classic Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2026

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API