Legal Opinion

Guthrie v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action against his insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), to recover benefits for injuries caused by the negligence of an uninsured motorist. The General Insurance Company of America (Safeco) intervened, alleging that it had overpaid plaintiff $5,000 by mistake and contending that this sum was owing from either plaintiff or State Farm. The case was tried to the court without a jury and the court held that plaintiff was not entitled to recover from State Fárm and that Safeco was entitled to recover the $5,000 from State Farm. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Smith v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Sparling v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Thurman v. Signal Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cascade Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. PacifiCorp v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  3. R Source Corporation v. Sealevel Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  4. Rempel v. United Parcel Service General Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API