Legal Opinion

King v. Branscheid

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1903No. 4517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William .0. Chapman,, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Dunbar, J.

The complaint in this action alleges that the plaintiff is the owner and in possession of certain real *636estate, therein described, situated in Pierce county, state of Washington; that on the Tth day of March, 1901, the defendant caused to be filed in the office of the auditor of said county a Us pendens which described the real estate of which plaintiff claimed to be the owner; that defendant’s lis pendens constituted a cloud on plaintiff’s title, and obstructed the sale and transfer of said property; that defendant claimed an interest and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. WillebyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Beezley v. SessionsWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Graham v. American Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hewitt v. LansdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Loy v. CoeyWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seargeant v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ahrens v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Burger v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API