Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. Lansdale

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1901No. 3755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County. — Hon. Henry S. Elliott, Judge.

1Per curiam

A motion to dismiss the appeal was taken with the record. The objection by respondents is that the appeal bond is defective. The judgment of the superior court was against the appellants, and for dismissal of the action, with costs taxed in the sum of $53. The appeal bond is in the sum of $200, and is conditioned that appellants “shall pay all costs and damages that may he awarded against them on such appeal or dismissal thereof, not exceeding the sum of $200.” But the bond here goes further and contains the following conditions; “And shall perform and satisfy any judgment which said court…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. BranscheidWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Smith v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API