Ahrens v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from the judgment of the superior court for King county, Bell, J., entered March 3, 1904, in favor of the city, upon excluding all evidence offered, dismissing an appeal from a municipal assessment.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
At the time of the first oral argument on this appeal, respondent suggested that the appeal bond is defective, and orally moved to dismiss the appeal. Argument was heard upon the subject, and the matter was taken under advisement. At the recent term of this court, another oral argument was heard, and the cause was submitted to the entire court as now constituted. The alleged defect in the appeal bond was not discussed at the time of the last oral argument. We do not understand, however, that respondent has abandoned its position in that matter, but rather that further discussion o-f it was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. BigelowWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- King v. BranscheidWashington Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goetter v. City of ColvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- In re the Appeal of PattersonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Amsbary v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1921