Loy v. Coey
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Whxiam E. Richardson, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
— The respondent moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the alleged appeal hond is ineffectual, in that the penalty of said bond, which purports to be an appeal and supersedeas bond, is not double the amount of the judgment and $200, required by the statute for bond on appeal. This case falls squarely within the rule announced in Pierce v. Willeby, 20 Wash. 129 (54 Pac. 999); Town of Sumner v. Rogers, 21 Wash. 361 (58 Pac. 214); Galloway v. Tjossem, 22 Wash. 163 (60 Pac. 129); Beezley v. Sessions, 22 Wash. 125 (60 Pac. 130); and Graham v. American Surely Co., 28 Wash. 735…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
- Pierce v. WillebyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Town of Sumner v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Beezley v. SessionsWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Galloway v. TjossemWashington Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- King v. BranscheidWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Washington Water Power Co. v. Abacus Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1908