Beezley v. Sessions
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Douglas County. — Hon. Charles H. Neal, Judge.
1Per curiam
A motion was made by the respondent to dismiss the appeal in this ease and affirm the judgment for several reasons; but we need notice but one of them, and that is that no appeal bond has been filed within the time limited by law, and that the same is not sufficient, either in form or substance, to render such appeal effectual. The record shows that the appellants applied to the superior court to fix the amount of a stay bond,- and the court fixed it at $250. The appellants thereafter filed a bond conditioned both as an appeal bond and a supersedeas bond in the sum of $250. It is stated in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pierce v. WillebyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Town of Sumner v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- King v. BranscheidWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Washington Water Power Co. v. Abacus Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Edminston v. SteeleIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Loy v. CoeyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Ritchey v. Cedar Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.