Legal Opinion

Seargeant v. Russell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1920No. 15667PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered May 29, 1919, dismissing an action in equity, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action is brought by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside an assignment and deed made by the bankrupt to the defendant. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment dismissing the action. From this judgment, the plaintiff appeals.

During the month of April, 1917, there were two actions pending against Prentiss Tucker, one in Grant county and the other in King county. The respondent in this case was the attorney for Prentiss Tucker in each of the cases. The Grant county case was for the purpose of foreclosing a chattel mortgage given to secure a promissory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Vietor v. GloverWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. National Surety Co. v. UddWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. West Coast Grocery Co. v. StinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of YandWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Manello v. BornstineWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Parchen v. HauschildWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Gazzam v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API