Legal Opinion
McNerney v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1995No. 94-CV-474S(H)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case has been referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Defendant Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”) has moved to (1) preclude plaintiff from introducing expert testimony regarding damages (Item 45),1 and (2) quash a subpoena directed to a third-party witness (Item 52). Plaintiff moves for an extension of time to conduct further discovery (Item 66). For the reasons that follow, the motion to preclude is denied, the motion to quash is granted, and the motion to extend time is denied.
BACKGR…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. BraddickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Francis J. Langford, Individually and as Natural Guardian of Frank P. Langford, an Infant v. Chrysler Motors Corp., and Woodbridge Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Hinton v. PatnaudeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. v. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Vogue Instrument Corp. v. Lem Instruments Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ebewo v. MartinezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Chimarev v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Magee v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Sullivan v. Glock, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.