Legal Opinion

Gualtieri v. Burleson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1987No. 8615DC722PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant’s assignments of error contending that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment against him are without merit and we overrule them. The court’s decisive findings of fact —to the effect that plaintiff agreed with defendant to provide the services involved and that plaintiff told defendant he would charge him the per diem and hourly fees above stated —are amply supported by evidence, and clearly support the court’s conclusion that defendant personally contracted to pay plaintiff for the services admittedly rendered in the Kirby case. Defendant’s argument is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Booth v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Holt v. HoltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Street v. Smart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Charles Vernon Floyd, Jr. & Sons, Inc. v. Cape Fear Farm Credit, ACASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust from Allan & Warmbold Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Copp v. BreskinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Bunting v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API