Copp v. Breskin
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Breskin & Robbins, a law firm, appeals a summary judgment in favor of Harley Copp, an expert witness hired by the firm on behalf of a client. Copp successfully claimed $14,789 for expert services.
Facts
Breskin & Robbins advised Copp before hiring him that fees "were being paid, and were to be paid" by the client. Copp says he would never accept employment if an attorney's obligation were dependent on reimbursement from a client. He made this policy known.
Breskin & Robbins concedes by way of deposition that, absent an agreement to the contrary, a provider of litigation services can expect an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Short v. DemopolisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Allard v. First Interstate Bank of Washington, N.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Burt v. GahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Theuerkauf v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCullough v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Boesch v. Marilyn M. Jones & AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999