Legal Opinion

Holt v. Holt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1979No. 7828DC722PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*346CARLTON, Judge.

Ordinarily, there is no right of appeal from the refusal of a motion to dismiss. The refusal to dismiss the action generally will not seriously impair any right of defendant that cannot be corrected upon appeal from final judgment. 1 Strong, N.C. Index 3d, Appeal and Error, § 6.6, p. 200; Auction Co. v. Myers, 40 N.C. App. 570, 253 S.E. 2d 362 (1979). However, G.S. l-277(b) provides in part that an interested party “shall have the right of immediate appeal from an adverse ruling as to the jurisdiction of the court over the person or property of the defendant.” (Emphasis added.)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fraser v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Stallings v. HahnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Schofield v. SchofieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Gualtieri v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Tompkins v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API