Legal Opinion
McCready v. Bullis
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1922No. Civ. No. 3959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Defendant has appealed from a judgment allowing a recovery to the. plaintiff of the sum of $5,977 as damages.
On the second day of October, 1917, defendant, being the owner of a certain seventy acres of land in Los Angeles County, entered into a written contract of lease whereby he let the same to the plaintiff for a period of three years. As rental therefor plaintiff was to pay the sum of $1,200 for the first year and, as is stated in the lease, “for the remaining two years the sum of $1,500.” By a term of the lease it was required that the lessor should sink an artesian well on the property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Rice v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Landon v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hiatt Investment Co. v. BuehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
- Evans v. Rancho Royale Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.