Legal Opinion
Karapetian v. Carolan
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1948No. Civ. 13495PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
This action was brought by plaintiffs against defendants to recover damages for the alleged fraud and deceit of defendants. The cause was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict of $3,500. Defendants appeal from the judgment entered on that verdict.
Appellants do not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the implied finding that they were guilty of fraud; in fact, the sole point made by them is necessarily predicated on the premise that they were fraudulent. Thus at all times it must be kept in mind that defendants stand before this court asking reversal of a judgment in a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- House v. PierecyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Davis v. Rite-Lite Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Roam v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Denevi v. LGCC, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.