Legal Opinion

Mejia v. Irwin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 16, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 98-0326PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Miguel Mejia seeks special action relief from a sentence of two years in prison for violating the terms of his probation. Mejia argues that, as a first-time drug possessor, he is subject to the sentencing provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01 (Supp. 1998) and therefore cannot be sentenced to prison. We accept jurisdiction of this special action and grant relief.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In April 1997, police officers stopped the car Mejia was driving for a traffic violation. During the ensuing investigation, the officers found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goddard v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. State v. HanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. United States v. Stephen LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Lind v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Snow v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coy v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. State v. CampoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Foster v. IrwinArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gray v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API