Legal Opinion

Coy v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 12, 2001No. 2 CA-SA 01-0018PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLOREZ, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Frederick John Coy seeks special action relief from the respondent judge’s order in the underlying criminal proceeding, granting the real party in interest State of Arizona’s motion to withdraw from the plea agreement, which motion was made after the plea was accepted and judgment entered. Because petitioner has raised a nonfrivolous double jeopardy claim and does not have an adequate remedy by appeal, Nalbandian v. Superior Court, 163 Ariz. 126, 786 P.2d 977 (App.1989), and because we find the respondent judge abused his discretion in permitting the state…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. BoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Aragon v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. O'BRIEN v. EscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. State v. RicoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API