Legal Opinion
Rogozinski v. American Food Service Equipment Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 21, 1994No. 12396PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The plaintiff, Richard Rogozinski, appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered following the granting of the defendants’1 motions for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims the trial court improperly (1) held that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations, and (2) set aside the default for failure to plead against the defendant Connecticut Light and Power Company (CL&P).2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. In 1982, the plaintiff hired the defendant Henry M. Osowiecki and Sons, Inc. (Osowiecki) and other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Duhaime v. American Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Pintavalle v. ValkanosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peabody N.E., Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Daoust v. McWilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Richards v. TrudeauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Pospisil v. PospisilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. One 1993 Black Kenworth W-900 Truck & One TrailerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.