Legal Opinion

Daoust v. McWilliams

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 11, 1998No. AC 17265PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiff, William J. Daoust, Jr., appeals from the decision of the trial court rendering *717summary judgment as to all claims raised in his complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) determined that his tort claims of assault and battery, abuse of process, intentional spoliation of evidence, and invasion of privacy were barred by the statute of limitations and (2) applied the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel to the plaintiffs claims of deprivation of his constitutional rights, intentional infliction of emotional…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Posr v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Colon v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. GanimConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Twenty-Four Merrill Street Condominium Ass'n v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Krondes v. Norwalk Savings SocietyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town of DarienConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API