Legal Opinion
Peabody N.E., Inc. v. Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 10, 1999No. SC 16072PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
General Statutes § 52-592 (a),1 which is part of our state’s “saving statute,” allows a plaintiff to bring *107an action that otherwise would be barred by an applicable statute of limitations, within one year after the determination of a prior action or after the reversal of a judgment, if the “original action” has failed to be tried on the merits for any of several reasons enumerated in the statute, and if the original action was for the same cause as the later action. Although the parties to this appeal raise several issues, the dispositive issue is whether the plaintiff, who has…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Pintavalle v. ValkanosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Baker v. BaningosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Oxford Tire Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. ParraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. StewartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Tellar v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Gillum v. Yale UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.