Richards v. Trudeau
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendants, William Trudeau, Sr., Brett Trudeau and William Trudeau, Jr.,1 appeal from a default judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Noie Richards, Jr. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) refused to accept their answer and to set aside the default judgment, (2) rendered judgment against the defendants without providing them with adequate notice and (3) relied on the previous rulings of another judge as the law of the case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Whalen v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Tolland Bank v. LarsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Rogozinski v. American Food Service Equipment Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Willamette Management Associates, Inc. v. PalczynskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Merritt v. FaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. ScrogginConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. ScrogginConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.