Legal Opinion
United States v. Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 16, 1984No. 84-3501PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.
The State of Idaho appeals from the denial of its petition to intervene as of right in litigation concerning the extent to which the States of Oregon and Washington may regulate fishing in the Columbia River and its tributaries consistent with the treaty rights of several Indian Tribes. Idaho seeks to participate in negotiations for a modified management plan which could have significant impact upon Idaho’s fish resources in the upper tributaries of the Columbia River located in Idaho.
Because the district court based its denial upon the conclusion that the application…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. CostleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Garza v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sierra Club v. Us Environmental Protection Agency, and City of Phoenix, Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.