Legal Opinion

Kreidler v. Eikenberry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1989No. 55238-0, 55398-0PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, J. —

This case consolidates two actions: first, a direct appeal from a superior court order denying intervention in an action challenging the ballot title for Alternative Measure 97B; and second, an original action challenging the superior court's jurisdiction to hear ballot title challenges of legislatively enacted measures. Petitioners' primary objective is to obtain review on the merits of the Superior Court's ballot title decision. They contend that this court may reach the merits either by hearing the appeal of the order denying intervention or by hearing the original action…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. STATE EX REL. COSM. ETC. v. BrunoWashington Supreme Court · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Brown v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API