Legal Opinion
United States v. Alisal Water Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2004No. 02-16594PublishedCited by 202 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a judgment creditor is entitled to intervene as of right under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a) in an environmental enforcement action that may impair the creditor’s ability to collect a debt. Silverwood Estates Development (“Silver-wood”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to intervene in an action brought by the United States against Alisal Water Corporation (“Alisal”) for violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”), 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq. We have jurisdiction over the appeal of the denial of the motion to intervene pursuant to 28…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Donnelly v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by202 opinions
- AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. RodenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Ballen v. City of RedmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.