Legal Opinion

United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 6, 1966No. C.D. 2648PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

This American manufacturer’s protest involves the proper dutiable classification of merchandise described on the invoice as “Tee Nuts” and which was imported at New York from Italy. The merchandise in question was classified in liquidation as steel nuts under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1001, paragraph 330 (paragraph 330, Tariff Act of 1930), as modified by T.D. 51802, and assessed for duty at the rate of 0.3 cent per pound. It is claimed in the protest that the subject merchandise is properly classifiable under 19 U.S.C.A., *348section. 1001, paragraph 397 (paragraph 397, Tariff Act…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kaufman & Vlnson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Hirsch v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Clutsom Machines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  4. M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. V. Alexander & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  4. Bendix Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API