Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 17, 1964No. C.D. 2436PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

The issue raised by these seven protests, consolidated for purposes of trial, is as to the tariff classification of merchandise variously described in the protests, but which was identified on trial as reciprocating tools, called diamond files, made of steel and *57having a biting surface, or cutting face, of diamond. The merchandise was assessed with duty at 15 per centum, as a manufacture of earthy or mineral substances, not specially provided for, not decorated in any manner, under paragraph 214, as modified.

In protest 60/27820, the merchandise is identified as “diamond bort…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Kaysons Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Bendix Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Household Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Polaroid Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API