Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Be, Judge:
This case involves three protests which were consolidated for purpose of trial. The merchandise in protest 61/17396 consists of sheets, one-eighth of an inch in thickness, composed of standard hardboard with single veneers of Lauan (Philippine Mahogany) laminated to both sides, consisting of three plies, and cut to sizes intended for use in the manufacture of flush doors. The merchandise covered by protest 63/6296 consists of sheets, one-fourth of an inch in thickness, composed of standard hardboard with two veneers of Lauan laminated to both sides, consisting of five plies, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Stoner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- 200 Chests of TeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Joanna Western Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United States Treasury DepartmentUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Brooks Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- C. T. Takahashi & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.