Legal Opinion

County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1997No. C5-95-1584, C7-95-1585PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

This ease raises the question of what measure of damages is appropriate when a portion of property is taken for the reconstruction of a roadway that coincidentally includes the addition of a median foreclosing access to the remaining property from one side of the roadway. Appellants are property owners who had portions of their land taken, under the power of eminent domain, for the roadway reconstruction project. Appellants sought to have the partial loss of traffic access caused by the new median considered in the determination of damages for the partial taking.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Dale Properties, LLC v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API