Legal Opinion
Bailey v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 10, 2007No. 02-1078LPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
The plaintiff, Gary Bailey, alleges that the United States, acting through the Army Coips of Engineers (“Corps”), has taken his property without payment of just compensation. The matter concerns the application of the Clean Water Act (“the Act”) to a platted subdivision located in Lake of the Woods, Minnesota. Plaintiff contends that actions of the Corps, including the denial of an after-the-fact permit under section 404 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344, and the ordered restoration of land upon which a road was constructed, have resulted in a taking of the subject…
2Cases cited164 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Forest Glen Properties, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.