Legal Opinion

Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 2009No. A08-646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS, Judge.

This appeal arises from the district court’s refusal to order the state to condemn a private property interest in rural Clay County after the state closed access to a privately owned roadway that had linked the claimants’ parcel to Highway 10 since 1955. More precisely, Dean and Delores Oliver brought a mandamus action in the district court to compel the state to condemn their property interest in an easement over their neighbors’ property that allowed the Olivers to access Highway 10. The district court granted summary judgment to the state. We reverse and remand because…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Crowder Farms, LLC v. Jeff L. FlickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Loren K. Yarmon v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, 2000, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. Ugorets v. City of ShorewoodDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API