State v. Dunn
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
The State’s construction of a median strip that makes the route of travel to a business property more circuitous is not a compensable taking. We therefore reverse the trial court’s partial summary judgment in favor of business owner John M. Dunn against the State and the subsequent damages awarded to Dunn by a jury-
Facts and Procedural History1
Dunn entered the hotel business in 1978. Since that time, he has developed, owned, and operated more than twenty hotel properties. Appellant’s App. p. 114. One of these properties is located at 100 South Green River Road…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Gunkel v. Renovations, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ENSLEYIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- Indiana State Board of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines Living Center, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Kimco of Evansville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Buhmann v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- AAA Federal Credit Union v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Coutar Remainder I, LLC, Kooshtard Property I, LLC, Mac's Convenience Stores, LLC, f/k/a Bigfoot Food Stores, LLC, and Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- S.D. Dep't of Transportation v. Legacy Land Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.