Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Town of North Branford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 31, 2001No. AC 19891PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiffs, David Johnson and Eileen Johnson, appeal from the judgment of the trial court *644rendered after the court directed the verdict in favor of the defendant town of North Branford (town). On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that the court improperly determined that the applicable statutes of limitation barred their common-law negligence and nuisance claims and their statutory claim under General Statutes § lSa-138.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiffs commenced the present action against the town by service of process on July 14,1994. At trial,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Collum v. ChapinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- McDonald v. Haynes Medical Laboratory, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Vona v. LernerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Hunte v. Amica Mutual InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Sinotte v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Assurance Co. of America v. YakemoreConnecticut Superior Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.