Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Haynes Medical Laboratory, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1984No. 11063PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
With the consent of the parties, the trial court has presented to this court by reservation1 three questions of law. They are:
“(1) Is a cause of action which sounds in medical malpractice and which has been commenced more than three years from the date of the negligent act or omission complained of, barred by the statute of limitations, General Statutes § 52-584, if the plaintiff did not discover and could not, in the exercise of care, reasonably have discovered the nature of her injuries within three years from the date of the negligent act or omission complained of?
“(2) Does the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
- Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Dincher v. Marlin Firearms Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Muha v. United Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.