Legal Opinion
Collum v. Chapin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 5, 1996No. 14125PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that the plaintiffs action for interference with contractual relations was time barred by General Statutes § 52-577.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts were presented to the trial court by way of the pleadings and documents accompanying the motion for summary judgment.2 The plaintiff is a contractor who proposed to build a new postal facility on land he owned in Washington…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Shuster v. BuckleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Rioux v. BarrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Tryon v. Town of North BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- LaSalle National Bank v. Freshfield Meadows, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- New Haven Savings Bank v. LaPlaceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.