Sinotte v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendant, the city of Waterbury, appeals, and the plaintiffs, Delores G. Sinotte and Brian G. Sinotte, cross appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the defendant had created a permanent private nuisance by way of its maintenance of a sewer line connected to the plaintiffs’ home. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly determined that the plaintiffs’ private nuisance claim was not barred by the applicable statute of limitations. In their cross appeal, the plaintiffs challenge the court’s denial of their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Matthews v. FMC CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. CoopermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jagger v. SchiavelloSuperior Court of Delaware · 2014
- Rickel v. KomaromiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- CACIOPOLI v. LebowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Mollica v. TooheyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Wojtkiewicz v. Middlesex HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.