Grant County Constructors v. E. v. Lane Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Grant County Constructors, prime contractor on the Columbia River Wanapum hydroelectric project, seeks recovery against its subcontractor and the latter’s insurance carriers for fire damage to a generator shaft. The trial court, ultimately seeing an ambiguity in the contract between the two contractors and in the insurance policy, admitted parol evidence to explain the ambiguity. From this parol evidence, the court concluded that the prime contractor and not defendant subcontractor was on the risk at the moment of loss, and defendant insurance carriers, therefore, were not liable. The prime…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Gwinn v. CleaverWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Washington Fish & Oyster Co. v. G. P. Halferty & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Patterson v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), Plaintiff v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Dwelley v. ChesterfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Carlstrom v. HanlineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Green River Valley Foundation, Inc. v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Universal/Land Construction Co. v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.