Legal Opinion

Green River Valley Foundation, Inc. v. Foster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1970No. 39320PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeill, J.

Plaintiff, the purchaser under a real-estate earnest money receipt, appeals from a judgment denying specific performance of the contract. Defendants Foster are the vendors in that agreement who contend that they properly rescinded the contract by reason of plaintiff’s failure to timely pay the earnest money.

Plaintiff assigns error to the admission of oral testimony which allegedly varies the terms of the written agreement; to the trial court’s finding that a promissory note was not taken by the vendors as earnest money; and, on the basis of these asserted errors, to the holding that failure…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Starr v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Black v. Evergreen Land Developers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Grant County Constructors v. E. v. Lane Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Edward H. Mathews, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sears Pension Plan and Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. McGary v. Westlake InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API