S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), Plaintiff v. The Boeing Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of the crash of a Boeing 707 airliner. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Boeing, the defendant manufacturer. We hold that the court correctly resolved the choice of law issue and properly applied the governing law.
I. FACTS
On June 2, 1967, Boeing, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in the state of Washington, sold the subject aircraft to Seaboard World Airlines. A provision of the sales contract dictated that all disputes arising out of the contract were to be governed by Washington law. Article 6…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Offshore Rental Co. v. Continental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Mitchell B. Haisten, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Jean E. Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Global Comm. Trading Grp. v. Beneficio De Arroz Choloma, SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.