Gwinn v. Cleaver
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
— Appellants, plaintiffs below, sued to enjoin a threatened breach of restrictive covenants. The court found that projected building plans would not breach the restrictive covenants and dismissed the action. Plaintiffs appeal.
Appellants own lots Nos. 7 and 9 in Lakewood Terrace, a platted subdivision in King county, on the south side of Lake Burien. Respondent 2 owns lot No. 8. Appellant Gwinn platted the tract in 1951 and recorded the same, together with restrictive covenants, in August, 1951.
The restrictive covenant, which incorporates the plat by reference, provides, in part:
“All lots in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Washington Fish & Oyster Co. v. G. P. Halferty & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Granger v. BoullsWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Matthews v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Van Doren Roofing & Cornice Co. v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Olson Land Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Burton v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Grant County Constructors v. E. v. Lane Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Lenhoff v. Birch Bay Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- White v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Books a Million, Inc. v. H & N ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.