Legal Opinion
Carlstrom v. Hanline
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 10, 2000No. 44140-0-IPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
After a show cause hearing, the trial court granted a writ of restitution in favor of landlord finding that eviction of tenant was not retaliatory nor in breach of the Just Cause Eviction Ordinance. Tenant argues that the lease is inherently ambiguous, and that the hearing is unconstitutional because it violates his due process rights and right to a jury trial. As a matter of law, landlord properly evicted tenant after the termination of the lease. We affirm the trial court.
FACTS
David A. Hanline leased a room located in a Seattle rooming house from Properties Northwest on October 2, 1997.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Olympic Forest Products, Inc. v. Chaussee Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- McGary v. Westlake InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Soundgarden v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. McCormackWashington Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF PASCO AND FRANKLIN CTY. v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Housing Authority v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. HarmonWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Faciszewski v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Leda v. WhisnandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.