Legal Opinion

In re MH 2006-000749

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 13, 2007No. 1 CA-MH 06-0015PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant appeals from the superior court’s May 1, 2006 order compelling her to undergo involuntary inpatient and outpatient mental health treatment. The order was issued following a hearing at which Appellant was not present. We hold that although a patient has the power to waive attendance at an involuntary treatment hearing, the patient’s waiver is ineffective unless the superi- or court expressly finds that it is given knowingly and intelligently. Because we hold the evidence did not support the superior court’s conclusion that Appellant knowingly and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. LehrArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re Jesse M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. In re MH 2008-000438Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API