In re MH 2006-000749
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSEN, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant appeals from the superior court’s May 1, 2006 order compelling her to undergo involuntary inpatient and outpatient mental health treatment. The order was issued following a hearing at which Appellant was not present. We hold that although a patient has the power to waive attendance at an involuntary treatment hearing, the patient’s waiver is ineffective unless the superi- or court expressly finds that it is given knowingly and intelligently. Because we hold the evidence did not support the superior court’s conclusion that Appellant knowingly and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. LehrArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Jesse M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- In re MH 2008-000438Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.