Legal Opinion

Koller v. Arizona Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 9, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0310PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

¶ 1 After a hearing, an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) entered an order suspending plaintiff Betty Koller’s (“Koller’s”) driver’s license for refusing to take a breath test under Arizona’s implied consent statute, Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 28-691. 1 The trial court reversed the ALJ’s suspension order. The Motor Vehicle Division of the Arizona Department of Transportation (“MVD”) now seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment.

¶ 2 The issues presented are (1) whether a trial de novo is mandatory under A.R.S. section 12-910(0) (Supp.1997) when…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Sherrill v. Department of TransportationArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Schmitz v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Collins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State v. ClaryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Rowland v. Kellogg Brown and Root, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API