Legal Opinion

State v. Lewandowski

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 31, 2009No. 2 CA-CR 2008-0057PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant James Lewandowski appeals the trial court’s entry of a criminal restitution order, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-805, at the time of his sentencing. 1 He contends that under § 13-805, a criminal restitution order may not be entered prior to the expiration of a defendant’s prison term or sentence of probation and that the early entry of the order constitutes an illegal sentence due to the mandatory imposition of interest under § 13-805(C). For the reasons that follow, we vacate the restitution order.

Facts and Procedural Background

¶ 2 “We view the facts in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. State v. Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco BorquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. State v. ZINSMEYERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio PerezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. State of Arizona v. Albert Junior LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API