State v. Lewandowski
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant James Lewandowski appeals the trial court’s entry of a criminal restitution order, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-805, at the time of his sentencing. 1 He contends that under § 13-805, a criminal restitution order may not be entered prior to the expiration of a defendant’s prison term or sentence of probation and that the early entry of the order constitutes an illegal sentence due to the mandatory imposition of interest under § 13-805(C). For the reasons that follow, we vacate the restitution order.
Facts and Procedural Background
¶ 2 “We view the facts in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State v. Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco BorquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. ZINSMEYERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio PerezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Albert Junior LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.