Legal Opinion

Kilroy v. B.H. Lakeshore Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1996No. 69391PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Donnell, Judge.

Martin G. Kilroy, pro se, appeals a $2,250 judgment of the Euclid Municipal Court against him in favor of B.H. Lakeshore Company, the landlord, on its claims for leasehold damages after Kilroy filed suit to recover his $750 security deposit.

This is the second time the parties have litigated issues relating to this lease. On March 3, 1994, Lakeshore sued Kilroy for unpaid rent which Kilroy withheld because Lakeshore failed to make repairs to the premises. The trial court resolved that case when the parties signed an agreed judgment entry dated July 11, 1994 which provided for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. SkaggsOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Purpura v. PurpuraOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Sabouri v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Bikkani v. Lee, 89312 (6-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Whitehall v. Ruckman, 07ap-445 (12-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Karnofel v. Kmart Corp., 2007-T-0036 (12-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Citibank South Dakota, N.A. v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API