Legal Opinion

Whitehall v. Ruckman, 07ap-445 (12-18-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2007No. 07AP-445PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Mary Ruckman ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court finding appellant guilty of reckless operation in violation of Whitehall Codified Ordinance 333.02.

{¶ 2} The facts as adduced at trial are as follows. Whitehall Auxiliary Police Officer Tammy Scott was working special duty at Kroger in Whitehall, Ohio, when a customer, Van Gregg, approached her and reported that a woman was driving erratically in the parking lot. Mr. Gregg reported a woman cut off another vehicle nearly causing an accident in order to park in a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bond v. Village of Canal Winchester, 07ap-556 (3-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Williams v. Lo, 07ap-949 (6-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Lane v. U.S. Bank N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. J&H Reinforcing & Structural Erectors, Inc. v. Ohio School Facilities Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Gianetti v. Teakwood, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API