Legal Opinion
State v. Skaggs
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1978No. 77-720PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.
The. question on appeal-is whether in a petty .offense case, when the trial court undertakes the tape, recording of all proceedings Under. Crinn R. 22 and the court reporter is unable to transcribe from the tapes some of the proceedings., there is reversible error as a matter of law based upon the inadequacy of the. record.
Crim. R. 22 states, in part:
“In petty offense cases * * * if requested by any party all proceedings shall be recorded.
“Proceedings, may be recorded in shorthand, or steno-type, or by any other adequate mechanical, electronic or video recording device.”
The Court, of Appeals…
2Cited by139 opinions
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Kilroy v. B.H. Lakeshore Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. Patterson, Unpublished Decision (3-22-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.